### proof

What constitutes a valid type in lean?

How to proof that machine epsilon is the bound for relative roundoff?

How to Reduce Subset Sum to SAT and 3SAT?

Idempotents of a commutatitive ring in Lean proof assistant

Proof of Suffix tree root edges

Idris interactive prover won't perform rewrite on an assumption

Prove that p^3 - 1 is a composite number given P > 2 [closed]

Universal Quantification in Isabelle/HOL

Formal verification using denotational semantics?

Operator overloading in Isabelle

Failed to refine any pending goal

Seeming contradiction typechecks in Idris

Proof of existence of prime factorization (Educational)

Proving identity for binary operator on Fin

Idris rewrite tactic doesn't work as expected

Pumping Lemma for Regular Languages

Flattened matrix vs 2D matrix lookup equivalence (proof) - seeking more elegance

How do you prove probabilities are closed under multiplication with dependent types?

Proof assistant for mathematics only

Skip a subgoal while proving in Isabelle

Prove So (0 < m) -> (n ** m = S n)

How can I prove a type is valid in Agda?

How to use obvious facts in Agda proofs with “with”?

Proving correctness of algorithm

Prove using induction that the loop invariant holds

I can't prove (n - 0) = n with Idris

unresolved metas when defining a record in Agda

Prove ~s=>~p given (r=>s) and (p|q)=>(r|s)

Algebra Help on Inductive Proof?

How does agda's inspect function work?

How can I bind the schematic variable ?case in a rule for proof by cases?

Idiomatic Proof by Contradiction in Isabelle?

Is there a way to prove a program has no bug?

Proof of Loop Invariant and Algorithm

How can I prove the correctness of the following algorithm?

Apply a method if and only if it solves the current goal

Core of Verifier in Isabelle/HOL

In Coq, which tactic to change the goal from `S x = S y` to `x = y`

Proof on less than and less or equal on nat

Proof - Coq - Do I need induction?

Using coq, trying to prove a simple lemma on trees

Proving lemma with implication based on functions

Proving correctness in formal logic

I need a proof for a function postcondition

Formal Equivalence between programming languages

How to prove (forall x, P x /\ Q x) -> (forall x, P x) [In Coq]

### Related Links

How to make the assumption of the second case of an Isabelle/Isar proof by cases explicit right in place?

Idiomatic Proof by Contradiction in Isabelle?

Is there a way to prove a program has no bug?

Proof of Loop Invariant and Algorithm

How can I prove the correctness of the following algorithm?

Apply a method if and only if it solves the current goal

Core of Verifier in Isabelle/HOL

In Coq, which tactic to change the goal from `S x = S y` to `x = y`

Proof on less than and less or equal on nat

Homework - Prove Big-Omega

Proof - Coq - Do I need induction?

Using coq, trying to prove a simple lemma on trees

Proving lemma with implication based on functions

Proving correctness in formal logic

I need a proof for a function postcondition

Help with Big Omega Proof?